[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97F6D3BD476C464182C1B7BABF0B0AF5C11F641A@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:40:08 +0800
From: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jdike@...user-mode-linux.org" <jdike@...user-mode-linux.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM virtio-net.
>>On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Xin Xiaohui wrote:
> >The idea is simple, just to pin the guest VM user space and then
> >let host NIC driver has the chance to directly DMA to it.
> >The patches are based on vhost-net backend driver. We add a device
> >which provides proto_ops as sendmsg/recvmsg to vhost-net to
> >send/recv directly to/from the NIC driver. KVM guest who use the
> >vhost-net backend may bind any ethX interface in the host side to
> >get copyless data transfer thru guest virtio-net frontend.
>>
>> We provide multiple submits and asynchronous notifiicaton to
> >vhost-net too.
>This does a lot of things that I had planned for macvtap. It's
>great to hear that you have made this much progress.
>
>However, I'd hope that we could combine this with the macvtap driver,
>which would give us zero-copy transfer capability both with and
>without vhost, as well as (tx at least) when using multiple guests
>on a macvlan setup.
You mean the zero-copy can work with macvtap driver without vhost.
May you give me some detailed info about your macvtap driver and the
relationship between vhost and macvtap to make me have a clear picture then?
>For transmit, it should be fairly straightforward to hook up
>your zero-copy method and the vhost-net interface into the
>macvtap driver.
>
>You have simplified the receiv path significantly by assuming
>that the entire netdev can receive into a single guest, right?
Yes.
>I'm assuming that the idea is to allow VMDq adapters to simply
>show up as separate adapters and have the driver handle this
>in a hardware specific way.
Does the VMDq driver do so now?
>My plan for this was to instead move support for VMDq into the
>macvlan driver so we can transparently use VMDq on hardware where
>available, including zero-copy receives, but fall back to software
>operation on non-VMDq hardware.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists