linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: Assume regulators are enabled if they don't report anything

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1265973647.3231.2.camel@odin>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:20:47 +0000
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Assume regulators are enabled if they don't
 report anything

On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 17:22 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> If a regulator driver does not provide a way to query if the driver is
> enabled then assume that it is enabled.  This is very likely to reflect
> the actual state is more useful for callers than reporting an error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---

Applied.

Thanks

Liam

-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/