linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nl80211: does not allow NEW_STATION and DEL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:03:24 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Raffeiner <sturmflut@...berbiber.de>,
	Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@...ybit.com>,
	Javier Cardona <javier@...ybit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: does not allow NEW_STATION and DEL_STATION
 for mesh

On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:55 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:

> Sorry. This code has obviously given me an oops. I did it in a hurry
> and
> thought that was a good optimization to get out as early as possible
> in
> the case the device was not in AP mode.

Which device, at that point :)

> I have fixed it, but I would like to do a more thorough test now to
> make
> up for my mistake.
> 
> So, is there any test tool around? I am playing with iw code to do
> these tests. Any recommendations for the values of listen interval and
> the acceptable values for supported rates and aid?

I guess just using hostapd and connecting to it once would be a good
test for that code path, but the rest _looked_ fine to me.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)