[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B759635.1080908@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:56:05 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC: mszeredi@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, polynomial-c@...too.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support
Hello,
On 02/12/2010 10:53 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> That dev_offset value is used as an offset into the server side mmap
> address space. And yes, vma->vm_pgoff and dev_offset should be SHMLBA
> multiples apart.
Alright.
> But don't call that _adjustment_. That's totally confusing, these are
> *two* *different* *offsets*.
At this point, we're completely in the realm of the babel tower.
Unless we define all the terms explicitly, I don't think using or not
using a single word would make much difference. Working with FUSE
gets a bit confusing regarding which term means what but with
multiple process address spaces and the dmmap address space and all
the offsets, it's getting pretty ridiculous.
> There's an alignment requirement but that's all. If they are the
> same that is pure coincidence.
>
> And dev_offset (which points into the dmmap address space) is only
> required if the filesystem/CUSE driver needs server side mmap.
Hmmm... w/o the dev_offset how would the server designate which area
to use for the client?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists