[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100212150027.f875bbde.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:00:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/28] kdb,panic,debug_core: Allow the debug core to
receive a panic before smp_send_stop()
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:35:41 -0600 Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> wrote:
> It is highly desirable to trap into kdb on panic,
s/kdb/kgdb/
But is it necessary to do it in-kernel? Why not just put a
breakpoint at panic(), add that to your .gdbinit?
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index c787333..428d15b 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -66,10 +66,13 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
> */
> preempt_disable();
>
> - bust_spinlocks(1);
> va_start(args, fmt);
> vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
> +
> + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
> +
> + bust_spinlocks(1);
> printk(KERN_EMERG "Kernel panic - not syncing: %s\n",buf);
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> dump_stack();
> @@ -91,8 +94,6 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
> */
> smp_send_stop();
>
> - atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
> -
> bust_spinlocks(0);
>
> if (!panic_blink)
So the notifier call now happens before all the printks and the kexec
and kmsg_dump handling. What effect does this have upon the code which
implements kexec and kmsg_dump?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists