| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <64bb37e1002130125r7013832brc9b3b695daaf6f91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:25:46 +0100 From: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> Subject: Re: do_IRQ: 0.165 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Ping? I reported this problem one day after -rc1 was out and it's still there in -rc8, the probably last -rc for 2.6.33. (I also reported it against -rc2, -rc3, -rc4 and -rc6) Apart from the patches related to the SiI register HOST_CTRL_MSIACK (that did not fix the problem) I have the feeling, that I'm not one step further to any fix. Is this a bug in the MSI-enable code in sata_sil24? Is this a bug in the MSI code in libata? Is this a bug in the IRQ system? Is this a bug in the x86 apic code? Is this a hardware bug in the SiI 3132? Is this a hardware bug in the MCP55? Is this a fatal bug or does it just need the right quirk? What should I do now? Keep posting that it's still broken at each -rc? Open a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org? Against what subsytem? Should I just not use the sata_sil.msi=1 commandline? Or should dae77214fa71898b84514e43721fb7bf260b026a be reverted? On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:53 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> > It might be that the silicon implements MSI incorrectly and ends up >>> > sending out invalid MSI packets under certain circumstances. The >>> > silicon hasn't changed for quite some time now and back when it came >>> > out MSI wasn't too popular and I don't think SIMG's proprietary >>> > drivers use it, so it's quite possible that the feature simply is >>> > broken. Is there any specific reason why you want to enable MSI >>> > support? It's not like MSI brings any actual benefit when the >>> > compatibility hardware is already there. > > 19: 34618 3 2 4862 IO-APIC-fasteoi > sata_sil24, bttv0, Bt87x audio > [ 6.038918] IRQ 19/bttv0: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs > > The interrupt that the sata_sil24 is currently using is shared, so I > thought that switching this to MSI might be a good idea. > And I wanted to test a new feature. ;-) > >>> It also seems possible that some of the recent irq handling changes >>> missed something. >> >> No Eric. This particular report is with 2.6.33-rc kernels and also only >> when MSI support for sata_sil24 is enabled. Recent irq handling changes >> are all in -tip tree and getting tested. So this sounds like a different >> problem specific to this HW's MSI capabilities. > > Just to repeat this so not get this information lost: > MSI seems to work an this system. > The drivers radeon (X300), HDA intel (onboard sound from the MCP55 > chipset) and tg3 (two BCM5754) all work without any problems. > >>> Usually the message "No irq handler for vector (irq -1)" means that the irq >>> was delivered to a cpu that was not ready for it. I see that vector 165 >>> is being delivered on all of the different cpus with vector 165, >>> and that you are getting interrupts delivered most of the time. >> >> Also I see this in the original report: >> >> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 05:02 -0800, Torsten Kaiser wrote: >>> What is really strange: The vector 165 is stable. It never changed >>> even if I deactivate all other drivers in the kernel config (that >>> changes the MSI IRQ for sata_sil24 from 29 to 28!) or if I switch off >>> CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ. In the kernel with the reduced number of drivers >>> the maximum vector that gets used in __assign_irq_vector is only 137. >> >> It looks like the HW under certain conditions is generating interrupts >> with wrong vector (165), especially when the __assign_irq_vector() never >> allocated the vector 165 (and hence we never setup the vector to irq >> mapping for this vector on any cpu). Torsten, can you please apply the >> appended patch and boot with "apic_phys" boot parameter and see if it >> makes any difference? > > I tried the patch and the message from do_IRQ is gone, but reading the > file still fails with the same errors from libata. > (Earlier tests with writing a large file to this disk also failed with > timeouts, but never trigger the do_IRQ error) > > I added a diff between the dmesg from the testrun with your patch to > the previous run at the end of the mail. > >>> This smells like the initialization problems I was seeing in another >>> thread. Suresh? >> >> No. Initialization problems in another thread happens in a small window >> during cpu online (in logical flat mode, we are setting up vector to irq >> mappings for the AP a little late after we have enabled interrupts). >> Here the problem is not actually triggered during cpu on-lining. > > FWIW: # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is not set > > I don't use suspend/resume on that system, so I never enabled CPU > hotplug in the .config. > > Thanks for looking at this. > > Torsten > > > The changes in dmesg from you patch: > 1,2c1,2 > < x Linux version 2.6.33-rc6 (root@...ogen) (gcc version 4.4.2 (Gentoo > 4.4.2 p1.0) ) #1 SMP Sat Jan 30 10:38:39 CET 2010 > < x Command line: root=/dev/sdc1 console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty1 > sata_sil24.msi=1 radeon.modeset=1 raid=noautodetect apic=debug > --- >> x Linux version 2.6.33-rc6 (root@...ogen) (gcc version 4.4.2 (Gentoo 4.4.2 p1.0) ) #2 SMP Tue Feb 2 20:22:21 CET 2010 >> x Command line: root=/dev/sdc1 console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty1 sata_sil24.msi=1 radeon.modeset=1 raid=noautodetect apic=debug apic_phys > 61a62 >> x Setting APIC routing to physical flat. > 130a132 >> x Setting APIC routing to physical flat. > 159c161 > < x Kernel command line: root=/dev/sdc1 console=ttyS0,115200 > console=tty1 sata_sil24.msi=1 radeon.modeset=1 raid=noautodetect > apic=debug > --- >> x Kernel command line: root=/dev/sdc1 console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty1 sata_sil24.msi=1 radeon.modeset=1 raid=noautodetect apic=debug apic_phys > 163,164c165,166 > < x Node 0: aperture @ a7f2000000 size 32 MB > < x Aperture beyond 4GB. Ignoring. > --- >> x Node 0: aperture @ 20000000 size 32 MB >> x Aperture pointing to e820 RAM. Ignoring. > 202c204 > < x Setting APIC routing to flat > --- >> x Setting APIC routing to physical flat > 234,235c236,237 > < x ... lapic delta = 1249998 > < x ... PM-Timer delta = 357954 > --- >> x ... lapic delta = 1249989 >> x ... PM-Timer delta = 357951 > 237,241c239,243 > < x ..... delta 1249998 > < x ..... mult: 53687005 > < x ..... calibration result: 1999996 > < x ..... CPU clock speed is 2599.9959 MHz. > < x ..... host bus clock speed is 199.9996 MHz. > --- >> x ..... delta 1249989 >> x ..... mult: 53686618 >> x ..... calibration result: 1999982 >> x ..... CPU clock speed is 2599.9751 MHz. >> x ..... host bus clock speed is 199.9982 MHz. > 248c250 > < x Total of 4 processors activated (20800.14 BogoMIPS). > --- >> x Total of 4 processors activated (20799.96 BogoMIPS). > 430,431c432,433 > < x ... APIC ICR: 000008fd > < x ... APIC ICR2: 08000000 > --- >> x ... APIC ICR: 000000fd >> x ... APIC ICR2: 03000000 > 437,438c439,440 > < x ... APIC TMICT: 0001e847 > < x ... APIC TMCCT: 000174b3 > --- >> x ... APIC TMICT: 0001e846 >> x ... APIC TMCCT: 000185ee > 462,476c464,478 > < x 01 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31 > < x 02 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 30 > < x 03 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 33 > < x 04 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 34 > < x 05 00F 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 35 > < x 06 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 36 > < x 07 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 37 > < x 08 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 38 > < x 09 00F 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 39 > < x 0a 00F 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3A > < x 0b 00F 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3B > < x 0c 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3C > < x 0d 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3D > < x 0e 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3E > < x 0f 00F 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3F > --- >> x 01 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 >> x 02 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 >> x 03 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 >> x 04 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 >> x 05 000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 >> x 06 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 >> x 07 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 >> x 08 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 >> x 09 000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39 >> x 0a 000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3A >> x 0b 000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3B >> x 0c 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3C >> x 0d 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3D >> x 0e 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3E >> x 0f 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3F > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists