lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B76CA52.9020507@simula.no>
Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:50:42 +0100
From:	Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, shemminger@...tta.com,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	william.allen.simpson@...il.com, damian@....rwth-aachen.de
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] net: TCP thin dupack

On 13. feb. 2010 03:13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no> writes:
> 
>> Major changes:
>>       -Possible to disable mechanisms by socket option
>>       -Socket option value boundary check
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/sysctl.h     |    1 +
>>  include/linux/tcp.h        |    4 +++-
>>  include/net/tcp.h          |    1 +
>>  net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c |    7 +++++++
>>  net/ipv4/tcp.c             |    7 +++++++
>>  net/ipv4/tcp_input.c       |   11 +++++++++++
>>  6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> index d840d75..ded3f20 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ enum
>>  	NET_TCP_MAX_SSTHRESH=124,
>>  	NET_TCP_FRTO_RESPONSE=125,
>>  	NET_TCP_FORCE_THIN_LINEAR_TIMEOUTS=126,
>> +	NET_TCP_FORCE_THIN_LINEAR_DUPACK=127,
> 
> There is no need to allocate a binary sysctl here.
> 
> Eric

Thanks. I'll address this in the next iteration.

Best regrads,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ