[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100213160236.4767.48310.stgit@angua>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:02:37 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: monstr@...str.eu, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
jeremy.kerr@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.h
From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
Commit e22f628395432b967f2f505858c64450f7835365 introduced a build
breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we
don't have module.h
This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined.
While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a
tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we
ever do compile this as a module.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
---
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index 0ec4511..f8650dc 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/stat.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/prom.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "internal.h"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists