lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100213203117.50fa2656.vorstadtkind@googlemail.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:31:17 +0100
From:	Joris Dolderer <vorstadtkind@...glemail.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fsnotify: tree-watching support

Shall I, now, resubmit immediately or wait for other reviews?

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:12:15 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:

> On 02/13/10 01:05, Joris Dolderer wrote:
> > Add tree-watching support to fsnotify.
> > Hope mail works now...
> 
> Yes, much better, thanks.
> 
> The following review just concerns documentation...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Joris Dolderer <vorstadtkind@...glemail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/debugfs/inode.c               |    8 -
> >  fs/namei.c                       |    8 -
> >  fs/notify/fsnotify.c             |  188 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  fs/notify/fsnotify.h             |    1 
> >  fs/notify/inode_mark.c           |   46 ++++++-
> >  include/linux/dcache.h           |    3 
> >  include/linux/fsnotify.h         |   55 +++++---
> >  include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h |   51 +++++--
> >  8 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
> > index 037e878..17cd902 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +/* Notify this dentry's ancestors about a child's events. */
> > +void __fsnotify_ancestors(struct dentry *dentry, __u32 mask)
> > +{
> > +	if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_FSNOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED) {
> > +		struct dentry *parent;
> > +		struct inode *p_inode;
> > +		bool should_update_children = false;
> > +		bool send = false;
> > +
> > +		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> > +
> > +		parent = dentry->d_parent;
> > +		p_inode = parent->d_inode;
> >  
> > -	if (fsnotify_inode_watches_children(p_inode)) {
> > -		if (p_inode->i_fsnotify_mask & mask) {
> > +		if (fsnotify_inode_watches_children(p_inode)) {
> > +			if (p_inode->i_fsnotify_mask & mask) {
> > +				dget(parent);
> > +				send = true;
> > +			}
> > +		} else {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * The parent doesn't care about events on it's children but
> 
> 			                                           its
> (yes, it's just moved, but please correct it)
> ("it's" means "it is", not possessive)
> 
> > +			 * at least one child thought it did.  We need to run all the
> > +			 * children and update their d_flags to let them know p_inode
> > +			 * doesn't care about them any more.
> > +			 */
> >  			dget(parent);
> > -			send = true;
> > +			should_update_children = true;
> >  		}
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fsnotify_ancestors);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * notify tree-watching ancestors
> > + * @dentry: The dentry the walkup should start with
> > + * @file_name: The string that should be appended to this dentries' path
> > + * @file_len: The length of this string
> > + */
> 
> Please use kernel-doc notation for this and other exported symbols.
> See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for details, or ask me if you
> have questions about it.
> 
> E.g.:
> 
> /**
>  * fsnotify_far_ancestors - notify tree-watching ancestors
>  * @dentry: The dentry the walkup should start with
>  * @file_name: The string that should be appended to this dentries' path
>  * @file_len: The length of this string
>  * @mask:  <description>
>  */
> 
> 
> > +void fsnotify_far_ancestors(struct dentry *dentry, const unsigned char *file_name, int file_len, __u32 mask)
> > +{
> ...
> 
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fsnotify_parent);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsnotify_far_ancestors);
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * This is the main call to fsnotify.  The VFS calls into hook specific functions
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
> > index 3165d85..67ad9cb 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
> > @@ -195,14 +216,16 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry)
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags(inode);
> > +	 * or __fsnotify_update_descents;
> >  	 *
> >  	 * I really want to call that, but we can't, we have no idea if the inode
> >  	 * still exists the second we drop the entry->lock.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * The next time an event arrive to this inode from one of it's children
> 
> 	                          arrives                          its
> 
> > -	 * __fsnotify_parent will see that the inode doesn't care about it's
> > -	 * children and will update all of these flags then.  So really this
> > -	 * is just a lazy update (and could be a perf win...)
> > +	 * __fsnotify_ancestors resp. fsnotify_far_ancestors will see that the
> 
> What is "resp." ?
> 
> > +	 * inode doesn't care about it's children and will update all of these
> 
> 	                            its
> 
> > +	 * flags then.  So really this is just a lazy update (and could be a
> > +	 * perf win...)
> >  	 */
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> > index 4d6f47b..1bea473 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > -static inline int fsnotify_inode_watches_children(struct inode *inode)
> > +static inline bool fsnotify_inode_watches_something(struct inode *inode, u32 what)
> >  {
> > -	/* FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD is set if the inode may care */
> > -	if (!(inode->i_fsnotify_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
> > +	/* what is set if the inode may care */
> > +	if (!(inode->i_fsnotify_mask & what))
> >  		return 0;
> 
> 		return false;
> 
> >  	/* this inode might care about child events, does it care about the
> >  	 * specific set of events that can happen on a child? */
> >  	return inode->i_fsnotify_mask & FS_EVENTS_POSS_ON_CHILD;
> >  }
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ