[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1hbpkojr7.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:26:04 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] tip related: radix tree for spareseirq and logical flat clean up
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> writes:
> I don't have the code in front of me, but I think that change should be OK. Xen just wants to initiate interrupt delivery for a given irq. At least for x86; I won't make any claims for ia64.
Thanks.
For ia64 the change should be a noop, generic_handle_irq_desc calls
__do_IRQ when needed.
On x86 the big differences are:
- No more stack overflow check.
- Not switching to the irq stack for i386.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists