linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/9] x86/pic: introduce legacy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07559FB80D03@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:40:28 -0800
From:	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
	"Du, Alek" <alek.du@...el.com>, "Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] x86/pic: introduce legacy_pic abstraction

>From 4fe315a8535a0baadc2252f10cc76f98ed73f72b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:24:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] x86/pic: introduce legacy_pic abstraction

this patch makes i8259a like legacy programmable interrupt controller code into a driver
so that legacy pic functions can be selected at runtime based on platform information, such
as HW subarchitecure ID.
default structure of legacy_pic maintains the current code path for x86pc.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h |   13 ++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c      |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
index 58d7091..e8a3e05 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ static inline void outb_pic(unsigned char value, unsigned int port)
 
 extern struct irq_chip i8259A_chip;
 
+struct legacy_pic {
+	int nr_legacy_irqs;
+	struct irq_chip *chip;
+	void (*mask_all)(void);
+	void (*restore_mask)(void);
+	void (*init)(int auto_eoi);
+	int (*irq_pending)(unsigned int irq);
+	void (*make_irq)(unsigned int irq);
+};
+
+extern struct legacy_pic *legacy_pic;
+extern struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic;
+
 extern void mask_8259A(void);
 extern void unmask_8259A(void);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
index df89102..b80987c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
@@ -358,3 +358,46 @@ void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
 }
+/*
+ * make i8259 a driver so that we can select pic functions at run time. the goal
+ * is to make x86 binary compatible among pc compatible and non-pc compatible
+ * platforms, such as x86 MID.
+ */
+
+static void __init legacy_pic_noop(void) { };
+static void __init legacy_pic_uint_noop(unsigned int unused) { };
+static void __init legacy_pic_int_noop(int unused) { };
+
+static struct irq_chip dummy_pic_chip  = {
+	.name = "dummy pic",
+	.mask = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
+	.unmask = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
+	.disable = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
+	.mask_ack = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
+};
+static int legacy_pic_irq_pending_noop(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic = {
+	.nr_legacy_irqs = 0,
+	.chip = &dummy_pic_chip,
+	.mask_all = legacy_pic_noop,
+	.restore_mask = legacy_pic_noop,
+	.init = legacy_pic_int_noop,
+	.irq_pending = legacy_pic_irq_pending_noop,
+	.make_irq = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
+};
+
+struct legacy_pic default_legacy_pic = {
+	.nr_legacy_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
+	.chip  = &i8259A_chip,
+	.mask_all  = mask_8259A,
+	.restore_mask = unmask_8259A,
+	.init = init_8259A,
+	.irq_pending = i8259A_irq_pending,
+	.make_irq = make_8259A_irq,
+};
+
+struct legacy_pic *legacy_pic = &default_legacy_pic;
-- 
1.6.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/