[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100214155326.GA2842@debian>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:23:27 +0530
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: ftrace: fix and update dynamic ftrace
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:08:40PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > index 103f7ee..4a56a2e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > @@ -2,12 +2,29 @@
> > #define _ASM_ARM_FTRACE
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > -#define MCOUNT_ADDR ((long)(mcount))
> > +#define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)(__gnu_mcount_nc))
> hhmm, does this work with both the old and the new mcount function?
Yes, MCOUNT_ADDR is not used by the generic ftrace code directly, but is
instead only passed to our arch specific functions. We determine the
right mcount address to use there:
> +#define OLD_MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long) mcount)
[..]
> +static unsigned long adjust_address(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + if (!rec->arch.old_mcount)
> + return addr;
> +
> + if (addr == MCOUNT_ADDR)
> + addr = OLD_MCOUNT_ADDR;
> + else if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR)
> + addr = OLD_FTRACE_ADDR;
> +
> + return addr;
> +}
I changed MCOUNT_ADDR from mcount to __gnu_mcount_nc because we always
build __gnu_mcount_nc in, but don't build mcount when using Thumb-2.
Rabin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists