[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4877c76c1002132002s20d942c3i7cee5418cdcf369c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:02:30 -0800
From: Michael Evans <mjevans1983@...il.com>
To: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<volkerarmin@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>0.90 has a very bad problem, which is that it is hard to distinguish
>>between a RAID partition at the end of volume and a full RAID device.
>>This is because 0.90 doesn't actually tell you the start of the device.
>>
>>Then, of course, there are a lot of limitations on size, number of
>>devices, and so on in 0.90.
>
> but it is the only format supporting autodetection.
>
> So - when will autodetection be introduced with 1.X? And if not, why not?
>
> All I found was 'autodetection might be troublesome' and nothing else.
> But dealing with initrds is troublesome too. Pure evil even.
>
> Glück Auf,
> Volker
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
I remember hearing that 1.x had /no/ plans for kernel level
auto-detection ever. That can be accomplished in early-userspace
leaving the code in the kernel much less complex, and therefore far
more reliable.
In other words, 'auto-detection' for 1.x format devices is using an
initrd/initramfs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists