lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100214213724.GA28392@discord.disaster>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:37:24 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Ankit Jain <radical@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:45:24 Ankit Jain wrote:
> > > +static int __init readahead(char *str)
> > > +{
> > > +       if (!str)
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +       vm_max_readahead_kb = memparse(str, &str) / 1024ULL;
> > 
> > Just wondering, shouldn't you check whether the str had a valid value
> > [memparse (str, &next); next > str ..] and if it didn't, then use the
> > DEFAULT_VM_MAX_READAHEAD ? Otherwise, incase of a invalid
> > value, the readahead value will become zero.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the review. Here is the fixed patch that checks whether all of the
> parameters value is consumed.
> 
> Thanks
> Nikanth
> 
> From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
> 
> Add new kernel parameter "readahead", which would be used instead of the
> value of VM_MAX_READAHEAD. If the parameter is not specified, the default
> of 128kb would be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 736d456..354e6f1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2148,6 +2148,8 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
>  			Format: <reboot_mode>[,<reboot_mode2>[,...]]
>  			See arch/*/kernel/reboot.c or arch/*/kernel/process.c
>  
> +	readahead=	Default readahead value for block devices.
> +

I think the description should define the units (kb) and valid value
ranges e.g. page size to something not excessive - say 65536kb.  The
above description is, IMO, useless without refering to the source to
find out this information....

[snip]

> @@ -249,6 +250,24 @@ static int __init loglevel(char *str)
>  
>  early_param("loglevel", loglevel);
>  
> +static int __init readahead(char *str)
> +{
> +	unsigned long readahead_kb;
> +
> +	if (!str)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	readahead_kb = memparse(str, &str) / 1024ULL;
> +	if (*str != '\0')
> +		return -EINVAL;

And readahead_kb needs to be validated against the range of
valid values here.

> +
> +	vm_max_readahead_kb = readahead_kb;
> +	default_backing_dev_info.ra_pages = vm_max_readahead_kb
> +						* 1024 / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +early_param("readahead", readahead);
> +

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ