[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266127794.16346.59.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:09:54 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: monstr@...str.eu, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com,
davem@...emloft.net, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.h
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:02 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
>
> Commit e22f628395432b967f2f505858c64450f7835365 introduced a build
> breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we
> don't have module.h
>
> This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined.
> While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a
> tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we
> ever do compile this as a module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> index 0ec4511..f8650dc 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/stat.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> #include <asm/prom.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include "internal.h"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists