[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266142324.5273.411.camel@laptop>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:12:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf_events: Fix FORK events
Ingo, could you stick this in perf/urgent, this needs to make .33
---
Commit 22e19085 ("Honour event state for aux stream data") introduced a
bug where we would drop FORK events.
The thing is that we deliver FORK events to the child process' event,
which at that time will be PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE because the child
won't be scheduled in (we're in the middle of fork).
Solve this twice, change the event state filter to exclude only disabled
(STATE_OFF) or worse, and deliver FORK events to the current (parent).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +++++------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index d27746b..57d6297 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -3259,8 +3259,6 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struct perf_event *event,
task_event->event_id.tid = perf_event_tid(event, task);
task_event->event_id.ptid = perf_event_tid(event, current);
- task_event->event_id.time = perf_clock();
-
perf_output_put(&handle, task_event->event_id);
perf_output_end(&handle);
@@ -3268,7 +3266,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
- if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
@@ -3300,7 +3298,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
if (!ctx)
- ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
+ ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
@@ -3331,6 +3329,7 @@ static void perf_event_task(struct task_struct *task,
/* .ppid */
/* .tid */
/* .ptid */
+ .time = perf_clock(),
},
};
@@ -3380,7 +3379,7 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
- if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
@@ -3500,7 +3499,7 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
{
- if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists