[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266142330.5273.414.camel@laptop>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:12:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/13] vfs: apply lockdep-based checking
to rcu_dereference() uses
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 16:00 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> -#define files_fdtable(files) (rcu_dereference((files)->fdt))
> +#define files_fdtable(files) \
> + (rcu_dereference_check((files)->fdt, \
> + rcu_read_lock_held() || \
> + lockdep_is_held(&(files)->file_lock) ||
> \
> + atomic_read(&files->count) == 1))
>
> struct file_operations;
> struct vfsmount;
> @@ -78,7 +82,7 @@ static inline struct file * fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned in
> struct fdtable *fdt = files_fdtable(files);
>
> if (fd < fdt->max_fds)
> - file = rcu_dereference(fdt->fd[fd]);
> + file = rcu_dereference_check(fdt->fd[fd], rcu_read_lock_held() || lockdep_is_held(&files->file_lock) || atomic_read(&files->count) == 1);
> return file;
I'm almost thinking you can do something smart here and not replicate
that condition :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists