linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B77DC6E.8070902@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:20:14 +0100
From:	Bart Hartgers <bart.hartgers@...il.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, juergen.metzdorf@...elev-dsl.de,
	markpschool@...mail.com, sporadic.crash@...il.com, apopov@...ma.bg,
	david@...mber.co.za, jay4mail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA
 write

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 01:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch
>>> for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make
>>> sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be
>>> helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports.
>>
>> Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea.
>>
>>> Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is
>>> prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the
>>> vt6420 one)?
>>
>> I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough.
>
> Agreed...  ping, Bart?
>
Hi Jeff,

I was waiting for some feedback on whether this patch actually solves 
the problem for others as well. Unfortunately, I didn't get any response 
so far, that's why I didn't resend the patch yet. But I guess it doesn't 
make sense to wait any longer, so I'll redo the patch and send it in a 
separate mail in a few minutes.

(I also tried searching for people suffering from this bug in the past 3 
months, and couldn't find any. I _did_ see some recent posts on various 
bug-lists by Tejun asking to test my patch, but again no response.)

Groeten,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/