[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266150215.5273.601.camel@laptop>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:23:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for
hweight_long(CONSTANT)
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:24 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, your suggestion might work, we
> simply need to rename the lib/hweight.c versions to __sw_hweightN
> and have <asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h> have __arch_hweightN ->
> __sw_hweightN wrappers in the default case, all arches which have an
> optimized version will provide it in their respective bitops header...
>
I'm not quite sure what the last 'it' refers to, does that refer to:
1) an __arch_hweightN() implementation, or
2) __arch_hweightN() -> __sw_hweightN() wrappers ?
If you meant 1, then yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists