[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100214.222446.138687519.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:24:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mb@...sch.de,
stefano.brivio@...imi.it, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] ssb: open-code dma_alloc_coherent
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:21:58 +0900
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: [PATCH -mm] ssb: open-code dma_alloc_coherent
>
> This removes ssb_dma_alloc_consistent, a wrapper for
> dma_alloc_coherent and pci_alloc_consistent. dma_alloc_coherent
> internally calls pci_alloc_consistent against pci devices so we always
> use dma_alloc_coherent.
>
> I prefer to use the DMA API directly instead of creating the ssb_dma_
> API. We have been removing any bus specific DMA APIs.
>
> One disadvantage of this approach that we lost the debugging ability
> of checking the buggy usage of the DMA API against non DMA-capable ssb
> buses. But I guess that the ssb drivers are mature enough and can cope
> with such change?
>
> I plan to replace all the ssb_dma API if this approach is fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
I'm fine with this:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists