linux-kernel - Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100215090832.GA24362@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:08:32 +1300
From:	martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Asdo <asdo@...ftmail.org>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Michael Evans <mjevans1983@...il.com>,
	Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

also sprach Gabor Gombas <gombasg@...ikabel.hu> [2010.02.15.1028 +1300]:
> There is no autodetection with 1.1. Once you have mdadm.conf you have
> pretty hard rules about what to look for and how to assemble it - ie.
> there is not much left to "auto" detect. Real autodetection would mean
> there is _no_ such information available, and you figure out everything
> by just looking at the devices you find.

Which, coincidentally, is where we're heading with incremental
assembly. Check the Debian experimental package if you want to try.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"we should have a volleyballocracy.
 we elect a six-pack of presidents.
 each one serves until they screw up,
 at which point they rotate."
                                                      -- dennis miller
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@...duck.net

Download attachment "digital_signature_gpg.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)