[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100215100712.GC21783@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:07:12 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haicheng.li@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case in fallback_alloc() v2
> This is a better way to go anyway because it really is a proper
> "fallback" alloc. I think that possibly used to work (ie. kmem_getpages
> would be able to pass -1 for the node there) but got broken along the
> line.
Thanks for the review.
I should add there's still one open problem: in some cases
the oom killer kicks in on hotadd. Still working on that one.
In general hotadd was mighty bitrotted :/
>
> Although it's not such a hot path to begin with, care to put a branch
> annotation there?
pointer == NULL is already default unlikely in gcc
/* Pointers are usually not NULL. */
DEF_PREDICTOR (PRED_POINTER, "pointer", HITRATE (85), 0)
DEF_PREDICTOR (PRED_TREE_POINTER, "pointer (on trees)", HITRATE (85), 0)
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists