[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1wryed9w0.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:19:11 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
"Christian Casteyde" <casteyde.christian@...e.fr>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
> Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@...e.fr>
> Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old)
I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329
It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically
allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise
it seems to be working well.
Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing
in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists