[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B794082.1070004@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:39:30 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using
fixed port numbers
Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch series is based on Amerigo's v2 but it now uses a bitmap
> for port reservation.
>
> I've ran a while (1) { bind(0) } test (with ip_local_port_range
> 1024 65000) to see if there is any performance difference between the
> two approaches (ranges vs bitmap). I could not detect any significant
> difference, both cases scored in 2.76s +/- 0.01 on my setup.
>
> I've based this patch series on current net-next, but it contains a
> significant non networking part. Please let me know if I should handle
> this differently.
>
> Octavian Purdila (3):
> sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
> sysctl: add proc_dobitmap
> net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
>
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 12 +
> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 7 +-
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +
> include/net/ip.h | 6 +
> kernel/sysctl.c | 374 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 +
> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +
> net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 7 +
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +-
> net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +
> 10 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
>
Hey, Octavian, typo in netdev list name...
Could you please fix it and resend? So that this will get more reviews.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists