[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100215124842.GF21783@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:48:42 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] tcp: harmonize tcp_vx_rcv header length assumptions
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:28:44AM -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Harmonize tcp_v4_rcv() and tcp_v6_rcv() -- better document tcp doff
> and header length assumptions, and carefully compare implementations.
>
> Reduces multiply/shifts, marginally improving speed.
>
> Removes redundant tcp header length checks before checksumming.
>
> Instead, assumes (and documents) that any backlog processing and
> transform policies will carefully preserve the header, and will
> ensure the socket buffer length remains >= the header size.
I reviewed the patch and it looks ok to me. As far as I can
see it's mostly manual CSE, no real behaviour change.
Normally it's customary to separate formatting changes from
real changes, but it was only in a few places and not too bad.
I didn't fully understand that new comment:
/* nf_reset(skb); in ip6_input.c ip6_input_finish() */
Overall you can add a
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists