[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B796C4B.50700@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:46:19 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tun: socket filter support
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> I'm not sure how the tun socket is exposed, but won't the regular
>> SO_ATTACH_FILTER/SO_DETACH_FILTER setsockopts already work for
>> tun sockets?
>
> The tun socket is not exposed at all, it's an implementation detail
> of the tun/tap driver, which only has a chardev interface with
> ioctl methods.
I see, thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists