[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100215154751.GG3434@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:47:51 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
npiggin@...e.de, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement writeback livelock avoidance using
page tagging
On Fri 12-02-10 11:39:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:06:23 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > The idea is simple: Tag all pages that should be written back
> > with a special tag (TOWRITE) in the radix tree. This can be done
> > rather quickly and thus livelocks should not happen in practice.
> > Then we start doing the hard work of locking pages and sending
> > them to disk only for those pages that have TOWRITE tag set.
>
> Adding a second pass across all the pages sounds expensive?
Strictly speaking it's just through the radix tree and only through
branches with DIRTY_TAG set. But yes, there is some additional CPU cost.
I just thought that given the total cost of submitting a page it is
an acceptable increase and the simplification is worth it.
Would some numbers make you happier? Any suggestion for measurements?
Because I think that even for writes to tmpfs the change will be lost
in the noise...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists