linux-kernel - Re: [LOCKING] 2.6.33-rc8 btrfs vs java

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:56:53 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LOCKING] 2.6.33-rc8 btrfs vs java

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:14:50PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Found this in my log for 2.6.33-rc8.  Figgured it might be interesting since .33 is close.

The btrfs tree locking is very tricky for lockdep.  I don't quite see
how you could hit this one without also deadlocking the machine, unless
it is a false positive.

So, did you deadlock the machine? ;)

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/