[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100215185206.GA25608@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:52:06 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit
On 02/15, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> On 02/15/2010 08:50 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Could you please point me where do we check TS_COMPAT during return
> > to user-mode?
> >
>
> Sorry, I was thinking about TIF_IA32, which is examined on line 415 of
> entry_64.S.
Yes, I understand we should set TIF_IA32, but my question was about
TS_COMPAT.
Oh. And ELF_PLAT_INIT() clears TIF_IA32... at this point it should
be already cleared by SET_PERSONALITY() ?
OK. If this is all really needed, please ignore me, I don't really
understand these details anyway.
> >> At that point (this is after the exec!) we don't get arguments anyway.
> >
> > I meant /proc/pid/syscall, but even if I am right this probably
> > doesn't matter.
>
> What does getting the arguments from a process which has never done a
> system call yet even mean? Presumably we get some kind of "null answer"
> which depends on the default register set; in that case the compat null
> answer is the correct one.
Indeed, not sure what I was thinking about, thanks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists