[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266269362.24665.8.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:29:22 -0500
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem changes for 2.6.33
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Eric Paris (5):
>
> > SELinux: add .gitignore files for dynamic classes
>
> This isn't such a good idea I've discovered after wasting half my day
> wondering why 2.6.33-rc8 oops in selinux
> code when vbetool runs.
>
> The problem (not sure what we or git can do, hence Linus cc'ed) is:
>
> a) git tree contains 2.6.32 + with old non-generated versions of
> flash.h and av_permissions.h
> b) git pull 2.6.33-rc8, nothing removes these old files, git status
> doesn't show them as they are now in .gitignore
> c) build 2.6.33, it picks up the include files from the old location
> not from the generated ones in the new tree.
> d) bad juju.
>
> I'm also doing out of tree builds btw.
I'm not sure I understand why the old ones didn't get cleaned up. They
did for me.
$ git checkout -b testing v2.6.32
$ find security/selinux/ -name flask\*
security/selinux/include/flask.h
[here I made a commit on MAINTAINERS just to make sure pull did
something]
$ git pull linus master
$ find security/selinux/ -name flask\*
[nothing]
$
I don't have those two old header files laying around. I understand why
your old ones are still there.
I build selinux which generates the new files (in slightly new places)
$ make security/selinux/
$ find security/selinux/ -name flask\*
security/selinux/flask.h
They moved from
security/selinux/include
to
security/selinux
I have a security/selinux/.gitignore which lists
$ cat security/selinux/.gitignore
av_permissions.h
flask.h
Which I believe means they match the old locations as well. Is there
some better way to ignore the new autogenereated files such that they
won't match include/flask.h? I don't understand why the old files
weren't cleaned up? Am I doing something wrong in my testing? Should I
be doing something better in the code?
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists