lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B79C775.1050903@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:15:17 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, paulus@...ba.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	bergner@...t.ibm.com
Subject: Re: register long sp asm("r1") incorrect

On 02/15/2010 01:04 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> It's true that most other use of it we have are global scope (local_paca
> in r13, glibc use of r2/r13, etc...) afaik, but since r1 itself is the
> stack pointer always, I think they pretty much guarantee it works.
> 

It should work, because r1, being the stack pointer, is already marked a
reserved register in gcc.

The reference Pavel is citing bascially states that gcc won't globally
reserve the register, which is true, but it is already reserved anyway.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ