[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266346135.9432.370.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:48:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>, ego@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix SMT scheduler regression in
find_busiest_queue()
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 23:55 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> The sched_domain will be rebuilt with the sched_group_cpus()
> representing only online siblings right? sched_group_cpus(group) will
> always be a subset of cpu_active_mask. Can please explain your
> comment.
__build_*_sched_domain() seems to only rebuild the sd->span, not the
sched_group's mask, cpu_to_*_group() only picks an existing group based
on the cpumask passed in, it doesn't change sg->cpumask afaict.
That is also the reason we drag load_balance_tmpmask all through
load_balance() afaict.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists