[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002162206.32797.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:06:32 +0100
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...glemail.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc: Michael Evans <mjevans1983@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.
On Dienstag 16 Februar 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, you wrote:
> >> In other words, 'auto-detection' for 1.x format devices is using an
> >> initrd/initramfs.
> >
> > which makes 1.x format useless for everybody who does not want to deal
> > with initrd/initramfs.
>
> You make this sound like some major big deal. are you running your own
> distribution? In most cases mkinitrd does the right thing when you "make
> install" the kernel, and if you are doing something in the build so
> complex that it needs options, you really should understand the options
> and be sure you're doing what you want.
>
> Generally this involves preloading a module or two, and if you need it
> every time you probably should have built it in, anyway.
>
> My opinion...
I am running my own kernels - and of course everything that is needed to boot
and get the basic system up is built in. Why should I make the disk drivers
modules?
That does not make sense.
And the reason is simple: even when the system is completely fucked up, I want
a kernel that is able to boot until init=/bin/bb takes over.
Glück Auf
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists