linux-kernel - Re: tracking memory usage/leak in "inactive" field in /proc/meminfo?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:22:33 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
CC:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: tracking memory usage/leak in "inactive" field in /proc/meminfo?

On 02/16/2010 04:26 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:

> For the backtrace scenario I posted it seems like it might actually be
> release_pages().  There seems to be a plausible call chain:
>
> __ClearPageLRU
> release_pages
> free_pages_and_swap_cache
> tlb_flush_mmu
> tlb_remove_page
> zap_pte_range
>
> Does that seem right?  In this case, tlb_remove_page() is called right
> after page_remove_rmap() which ultimately results in clearing the
> PageAnon bit.

That is right - and pinpoints the fault for the memory leak
on some third party code that fails to release a refcount on
memory pages.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/