[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266360977.16346.245.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:56:17 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mingo@...e.hu, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/28] powerpc,kgdb: Introduce low level trap catching
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:33 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> I took a peek at xmon, and it suffers from the same problem where you
> can place a breakpoint in any part of rcu_lock, notify_die, or
> atomic_notifier_call_chain and meet with recursive faults. I also
> checked that xmon appears to correctly return so as to continue if the
> exception was not intended for xmon.
>
> The reason I had not just moved the code block previously is that I was
> not looking to break anything such as xmon, which is the the only other
> user of this function.
>
> I'll add your ack, if you agree with the new version of the patch.
Almost, just stick a blank line here:
+ /* Debugger is first in line to stop recursive faults in
+ * rcu_lock, notify_die, or atomic_notifier_call_chain */
+ if (debugger_bpt(regs))
+ return;
---->
/* trap exception */
if (notify_die(DIE_BPT, "breakpoint", regs, 5, 5, SIGTRAP)
== NOTIFY_STOP)
return;
Please :-)
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists