linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] MFD: introduce lpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B7BE292.5080700@compulab.co.il>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:35:30 +0200
From:	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Denis Turischev <denis@...pulab.co.il>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MFD: introduce lpc_sch for Intel SCH LPC bridge

Samuel,

Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:03:17 +0200, Denis Turischev wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> Might be a good idea to use acpi_check_resource_conflict() or similar
>>> before instantiating the platform devices.
>> May be it worth to add such resource check directly to mfd_add_device function?
> 
> I'm not sure. I suspect that many MFD devices are never used on
> ACPI-aware systems, so it might be considered overkill. OTOH the calls
> resolve to empty stubs when ACPI is disabled so... I have no objection,
> but I'll leave the decision to somebody else ;)
> 

What do you think? Shall we add something like mfd_verify_resources that will call
acpi_check_region or something similar?


-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/