linux-kernel - [patch 0/5] seqlock: cleanup, raw_seqlock implementation, xtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100217183740.486724334@linutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:47:31 -0000
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 0/5] seqlock: cleanup, raw_seqlock implementation,
	xtime_lock conversion

The following series contains the following changes:

    - fix the last users of the oldstyle seqlock initializer 

    - implement raw_seqlock (for seqlocks which need a raw_spinlock in
      preempt-rt

    - convert xtime_lock to raw_seqlock and fix up all users

    - convert x86 vsyscall gtod seqlock to raw_seqlock

The patches have been used in the preempt-rt tree for quite a while
and are a defacto NOP change for mainline, but merging them takes off
the burden from preempt-rt.

Please review and comment.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/