[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7B31F1.60203@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:01:53 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/35] core: move early_res
On 02/16/2010 03:53 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> All this does would seem is it would change a build failure into a
>> runtime panic. I really fail to see how this is an improvement...
>
> current only x86 support to early_res replace bootmem.
>
> later if other arch is using that feature, it need to provide that get_max_mapped.
>
If so, it would be better if this code isn't compiled at all on
platforms that doesn't use it. Masking a compile-time failure with a
runtime failure when the code isn't actually used doesn't seem like the
right thing.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists