linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v4 3/3] net: TCP thin dupack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B7D06B4.60706@simula.no>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:21:56 +0100
From:	Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
	william.allen.simpson@...il.com, damian@....rwth-aachen.de,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 3/3] net: TCP thin dupack

On 02/18/2010 01:33 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:40:46 +0100
> 
>> Major changes:
>>       -Renamed variables, ioctl and sysctl.
>>       -Added sysctl documentation.
>>       -Removed redundant allocation
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
> 
> Patches #2 and #3 look the same, what's going on here?
> 
> Thanks.

The changes from v3 to v4 was basically in the naming. I 
changed names for the given variables both for patch #2 and
patch #3. The removal of the unneeded allocation was also
done for both patches. It seems also I have forgotten to 
include the general patch description for each patch. I will
fix this for the next round of changes.

Cheers,
Andreas


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/