linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1266493115-28386-10-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:38:34 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm

TDB.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index a64b871..ad419aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -973,6 +973,7 @@ static void svm_decache_cr4_guest_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static void update_cr0_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
+	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
 	ulong gcr0 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr0;
 	u64 *hcr0 = &svm->vmcb->save.cr0;
 
@@ -984,11 +985,25 @@ static void update_cr0_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 
 	if (gcr0 == *hcr0 && svm->vcpu.fpu_active) {
-		svm->vmcb->control.intercept_cr_read &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
-		svm->vmcb->control.intercept_cr_write &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+		vmcb->control.intercept_cr_read &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+		vmcb->control.intercept_cr_write &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+		if (is_nested(svm)) {
+			struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
+
+			hsave->control.intercept_cr_read  &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+			hsave->control.intercept_cr_write &= ~INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+			vmcb->control.intercept_cr_read  |= svm->nested.intercept_cr_read;
+			vmcb->control.intercept_cr_write |= svm->nested.intercept_cr_write;
+		}
 	} else {
 		svm->vmcb->control.intercept_cr_read |= INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
 		svm->vmcb->control.intercept_cr_write |= INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+		if (is_nested(svm)) {
+			struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
+
+			hsave->control.intercept_cr_read |= INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+			hsave->control.intercept_cr_write |= INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1263,7 +1278,22 @@ static int ud_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 static void svm_fpu_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
-	svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions &= ~(1 << NM_VECTOR);
+	u32 excp;
+
+	if (is_nested(svm)) {
+		u32 h_excp, n_excp;
+
+		h_excp  = svm->nested.hsave->control.intercept_exceptions;
+		n_excp  = svm->nested.intercept_exceptions;
+		h_excp &= ~(1 << NM_VECTOR);
+		excp    = h_excp | n_excp;
+	} else {
+		excp  = svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions;
+	        excp &= ~(1 << NM_VECTOR);
+	}
+
+	svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions = excp;
+
 	svm->vcpu.fpu_active = 1;
 	update_cr0_intercept(svm);
 }
@@ -1507,6 +1537,9 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_special(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 		if (!npt_enabled)
 			return NESTED_EXIT_HOST;
 		break;
+	case SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + NM_VECTOR:
+		nm_interception(svm);
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
@@ -2972,8 +3005,10 @@ static void svm_fpu_deactivate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	update_cr0_intercept(svm);
 	svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions |= 1 << NM_VECTOR;
+	if (is_nested(svm))
+		svm->nested.hsave->control.intercept_exceptions |= 1 << NM_VECTOR;
+	update_cr0_intercept(svm);
 }
 
 static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
-- 
1.6.6


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/