linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.33-rc5] Weird deadlock when shutting down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002180825000.4141@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:31:03 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.33-rc5] Weird deadlock when shutting down

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >  
> > Basically, the machine deadlocks right after printing the following
> > when doing a shutdown:
> > 
> > halt/4071 is trying to acquire lock:
> >  (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<c0000000001ef868>]
> > .sysfs_addrm_finish+0x58/0xc0
> > 
> > but task is already holding lock:
> >  (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0000000004cd6ac>]
> > .lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x84/0xf4
> > 
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.

You don't have a full backtrace for these things?

We've had lots of trouble with the cpu governors, and I suspect the 
problem isn't new, but the lockdep warning is likely new (see commit 
846f99749ab68bbc7f75c74fec305de675b1a1bf: "sysfs: Add lockdep annotations 
for the sysfs active reference").

So it is likely to be an old issue that (a) now gets warned about and (b) 
might have had timing changes enough to trigger it.

I suspect it is G5-specific (or specific to whatever CPU frequency code 
that gets used there), since I think we'd have had lots of reports if this 
happened on x86.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/