[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100217234002.GE12197@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:40:02 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: roel kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: don't read past config->interface[] if
usb_control_msg() fails in usb_reset_configuration()
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:09:45PM +0100, roel kluin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Sarah Sharp
> <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> >> After the loop `for (i = 0; i < config->desc.bNumInterfaces; i++)' if no
> >> break occurred, i equals config->desc.bNumInterfaces. so if
> >> usb_control_msg() failed then after goto reset_old_alts we read from
> >> config->interface[config->desc.bNumInterfaces].
> >> We can safely decrement i as well if the break occurred.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> >> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> >
> > Bah, yes, you're right. :) Good catch.
>
> Could you please confirm whether this patch is the better or the
> other (in this same thread)?
Can someone tell me which one is the correct one to apply, but resending
it to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists