[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7D7552.2010001@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:13:54 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take
irq_desc in addition to irq
On 02/18/2010 09:04 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> May I ask why these methods and why pass both irq and desc instead of
> just desc?
>
> I think in the long run passing both irq and desc through several
> functions may incur some maintenance cost that it would be nice not to
> pay (register pressure and increased chance of typos).
>
Indeed; if the IRQ number is needed the function should just get it from
desc->irq.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists