[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7D7AF9.9060600@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:38:01 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, thellstrom@...are.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, currojerez@...eup.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Uncool feature for TTM introduced by x86, pat: Use page flags
to track memtypes of RAM pages
On 02/18/2010 09:27 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org> writes:
>>
>> Can we modify the interface to support again changing from uc to wc
>> or wc to uc ? (i can try to do a patch for that).
>
> At least on Intel CPUs that support self-snoop (all modern
> ones) that should really be very cheap.
>
The UC/WC transition should be particularly trivial; I don't see any
reason it should have to go through any other procedure on *any* CPU --
selfsnoop shouldn't even figure into it, since neither UC nor WC
actually caches anything. For the WC->UC direction, all we should need
to do is to flush the write combiners; a simple wmb() will do that.
Self-snoop is about not having to flush something that can have been
cached, as is normally needed to do WB/WT/WP -> UC/WC.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists