[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100218202753.GI5964@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:27:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
thellstrom@...are.com, airlied@...ux.ie, currojerez@...eup.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Uncool feature for TTM introduced by x86, pat: Use page flags
to track memtypes of RAM pages
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:38:01AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 09:27 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org> writes:
> >>
> >> Can we modify the interface to support again changing from uc to wc
> >> or wc to uc ? (i can try to do a patch for that).
> >
> > At least on Intel CPUs that support self-snoop (all modern
> > ones) that should really be very cheap.
> >
>
> The UC/WC transition should be particularly trivial; I don't see any
> reason it should have to go through any other procedure on *any* CPU --
> selfsnoop shouldn't even figure into it, since neither UC nor WC
> actually caches anything. For the WC->UC direction, all we should need
> to do is to flush the write combiners; a simple wmb() will do that.
I'm not sure that is sanctioned by the SDM rules; AFAIK they don't
make any special exception for this case.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists