linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86: add support for multiple choice alternatives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:46:27 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86: add support for multiple choice alternatives

On 02/17/2010 04:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 01:42 PM, Luca Barbieri wrote:
>> This patch modifies the x86 alternative macros to allow more than one
>> alternative code sequence.
>>
> Suggest documenting the precedence of alternatives: if both feature1 and 
> feature2 are present, which newinstr is patched in?
> 

Looks like the last one in the sequence takes effect, which is
consistent with the operation of the single ALTERNATIVE() macro ...
anything else would be quite lunacy.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/