[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7DB266.10105@intcomgrp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:34:30 -0500
From: James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address
On 2/18/2010 4:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Setting a watchpoint on address 0 seems like an entirely reasonable thing
> to do. This change looks right to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
Okay with me. Most platforms use address 0x0000 for the RESET vector.
Nice to catch; only problem was if it was a true RESET the information
is gone anyway.
If not a true RESET, the caller tried to call a function at 0x0000 which
then really isn't allowed under most circumstances.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists