linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LSM: add static to security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6fcc0a1002190427k735dc6a8ha88cb79b4d333c3e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:27:14 +0200
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org,
	eparis@...isplace.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: add static to security_ops variable

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:23 PM, wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@...il.com> wrote:
>> It's not a barrier, it's garbage. Once you know the adress security_ops
>> ended up at, you simply write to it.
>
> How to find the security_ops address if the variable is static? Would
> you please make an example?

See /proc/kallsyms .

>> Not that easily, but they still can.
> That's why i suggest to make the variable to static, if you had wrote
> a rootkit, you will find that in kernel 2.4.x, there are many many
> rootkits, but in kernel 2.6.x, rootkit became fewer. Not all the
> kernel driver writers can master this method to find the variable's
> address.

Please.

> The patch also delete the secondary_ops variable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/