[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100219163247.984850788@kvm.kroah.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:29:56 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [63/93] ALSA: hda - use WARN_ON_ONCE() for zero-division detection
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit d6d8bf549393484e906913f02fa3c9518a2819b6 upstream.
Replace the zero-division warning message with WARN_ON_ONCE() per the
advice by Linus. This shouldn't happen, but if it happens, it's
possible that the bug happens often due to buggy IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
@@ -1858,12 +1858,9 @@ static int azx_position_ok(struct azx *c
if (!bdl_pos_adj[chip->dev_index])
return 1; /* no delayed ack */
- if (azx_dev->period_bytes == 0) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING
- "hda-intel: Divide by zero was avoided "
- "in azx_dev->period_bytes.\n");
- return 0;
- }
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!azx_dev->period_bytes,
+ "hda-intel: zero azx_dev->period_bytes"))
+ return 0; /* this shouldn't happen! */
if (pos % azx_dev->period_bytes > azx_dev->period_bytes / 2)
return 0; /* NG - it's below the period boundary */
return 1; /* OK, it's fine */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists