lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100219163235.855623621@kvm.kroah.org>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:29:14 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: [21/93] drm/i915: Update write_domains on active list after flush.

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

commit 99fcb766a3a50466fe31d743260a3400c1aee855 upstream.

Before changing the status of a buffer with a pending write we will await
upon a new flush for that buffer. So we can take advantage of any flushes
posted whilst the buffer is active and pending processing by the GPU, by
clearing its write_domain and updating its last_rendering_seqno -- thus
saving a potential flush in deep queues and improves flushing behaviour
upon eviction for both GTT space and fences.

In order to reduce the time spent searching the active list for matching
write_domains, we move those to a separate list whose elements are
the buffers belong to the active/flushing list with pending writes.

Orignal patch by Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, forward-ported
by me.

In addition to better performance, this also fixes a real bug. Before
this changes, i915_gem_evict_everything didn't work as advertised. When
the gpu was actually busy and processing request, the flush and subsequent
wait would not move active and dirty buffers to the inactive list, but
just to the flushing list. Which triggered the BUG_ON at the end of this
function. With the more tight dirty buffer tracking, all currently busy and
dirty buffers get moved to the inactive list by one i915_gem_flush operation.

I've left the BUG_ON I've used to prove this in there.

  Bug 26101 - [i915] xf86-video-intel 2.10.0 (and git) triggers kernel oops
              within seconds after login
  http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26101

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Adam Lantos <hege@...yma.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |   11 +++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -467,6 +467,15 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
 		struct list_head flushing_list;
 
 		/**
+		 * List of objects currently pending a GPU write flush.
+		 *
+		 * All elements on this list will belong to either the
+		 * active_list or flushing_list, last_rendering_seqno can
+		 * be used to differentiate between the two elements.
+		 */
+		struct list_head gpu_write_list;
+
+		/**
 		 * LRU list of objects which are not in the ringbuffer and
 		 * are ready to unbind, but are still in the GTT.
 		 *
@@ -558,6 +567,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 
 	/** This object's place on the active/flushing/inactive lists */
 	struct list_head list;
+	/** This object's place on GPU write list */
+	struct list_head gpu_write_list;
 
 	/** This object's place on the fenced object LRU */
 	struct list_head fence_list;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1552,6 +1552,8 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(struct
 	else
 		list_move_tail(&obj_priv->list, &dev_priv->mm.inactive_list);
 
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&obj_priv->gpu_write_list));
+
 	obj_priv->last_rendering_seqno = 0;
 	if (obj_priv->active) {
 		obj_priv->active = 0;
@@ -1622,7 +1624,8 @@ i915_add_request(struct drm_device *dev,
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj_priv, *next;
 
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(obj_priv, next,
-					 &dev_priv->mm.flushing_list, list) {
+					 &dev_priv->mm.gpu_write_list,
+					 gpu_write_list) {
 			struct drm_gem_object *obj = obj_priv->obj;
 
 			if ((obj->write_domain & flush_domains) ==
@@ -1630,6 +1633,7 @@ i915_add_request(struct drm_device *dev,
 				uint32_t old_write_domain = obj->write_domain;
 
 				obj->write_domain = 0;
+				list_del_init(&obj_priv->gpu_write_list);
 				i915_gem_object_move_to_active(obj, seqno);
 
 				trace_i915_gem_object_change_domain(obj,
@@ -2073,8 +2077,8 @@ static int
 i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	uint32_t seqno;
 	int ret;
+	uint32_t seqno;
 	bool lists_empty;
 
 	spin_lock(&dev_priv->mm.active_list_lock);
@@ -2096,6 +2100,8 @@ i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_dev
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list));
+
 	ret = i915_gem_evict_from_inactive_list(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -2690,7 +2696,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_gpu_write_domain(s
 	old_write_domain = obj->write_domain;
 	i915_gem_flush(dev, 0, obj->write_domain);
 	seqno = i915_add_request(dev, NULL, obj->write_domain);
-	obj->write_domain = 0;
+	BUG_ON(obj->write_domain);
 	i915_gem_object_move_to_active(obj, seqno);
 
 	trace_i915_gem_object_change_domain(obj,
@@ -3710,16 +3716,23 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer(struct drm_device *d
 		i915_gem_flush(dev,
 			       dev->invalidate_domains,
 			       dev->flush_domains);
-		if (dev->flush_domains)
+		if (dev->flush_domains & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS)
 			(void)i915_add_request(dev, file_priv,
 					       dev->flush_domains);
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++) {
 		struct drm_gem_object *obj = object_list[i];
+		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj_priv = obj->driver_private;
 		uint32_t old_write_domain = obj->write_domain;
 
 		obj->write_domain = obj->pending_write_domain;
+		if (obj->write_domain)
+			list_move_tail(&obj_priv->gpu_write_list,
+				       &dev_priv->mm.gpu_write_list);
+		else
+			list_del_init(&obj_priv->gpu_write_list);
+
 		trace_i915_gem_object_change_domain(obj,
 						    obj->read_domains,
 						    old_write_domain);
@@ -4112,6 +4125,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_object(struct drm_gem_
 	obj_priv->obj = obj;
 	obj_priv->fence_reg = I915_FENCE_REG_NONE;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj_priv->list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj_priv->gpu_write_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj_priv->fence_list);
 	obj_priv->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
 
@@ -4563,6 +4577,7 @@ i915_gem_load(struct drm_device *dev)
 	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm.active_list_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.active_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.gpu_write_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.inactive_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.request_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->mm.fence_list);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ